Legal Opinion
Zalkind v. Scheinman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 8, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
This is an action by Philip Zalkind, against Sol Scheinman, Jacob Mandel, Pronto File Corporation and Masell Manufacturing Corporation for infringement of plaintiff’s patents 2,218,011, 2,233,906 and 2,245,026. The defendants, in a counter*300claim against plaintiff and a third-party complaint against Guide System & Supply Co., plaintiff’s licensee, allege that Scheinman’s patent 2,277,155 and Scheinman’s and Mandel’s patents 2,012,857 and 2,110,-556 have been infringed by plaintiff and third-party defendant. Both plaintiff and defendants seek an accounting of profits,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Electrical Fittings Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- A. L. Smith Iron Co. v. DicksonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Old Charter Distillery Co. v. Continental Distilling Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1956