Heston v. Kuhlke
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
WILKIN, District Judge,
This action was brought under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, Section 63 of Title 35 U.S.C.A. The Complaint alleges that the plaintiff Heston was party to four interference proceedings in the United States Patent Office, Nos. 78936, 78937, 77479, and 78938, involving means and methods of removing tires from vulcanizing molds, and that he had been denied a patent. The case was submitted upon the record of the decisions of the Board of Interference Examiners, additional oral testimony, exhibits, stipulations, and briefs. The Complaint prays this court to adjudge…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Christensson v. HogdalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Eastman Kodak Company v. EI DuPONT De NEMOURS & COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
- Bunny Bear, Inc. v. Dennis Mitchell IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956