Christie v. Seybold
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky. In Equity. Bill by Charles Seybold against William EL Christie to obtain the issue to complainant' of letters patent which had been refused after a decision against Mm on an interference. A decree was entered for complainant. Respondent appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge,
(after stating the facts.) The questions arising in this case, covered by the assignments in error, are two: First, does Christie’s invention or device show, “in a power press, a platen detachably connected with the power-driving mechanism and provided with a counterbalancing weight?” and, second, if it does, which one of the two, Seybold or Christie, was the first or true inventor, within the meaning of the patent laws?
It is contended by appellant that it was too late for the complainant to raise the question, in the court helow, whether Christie’s device includes “a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Agawam Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bedford v. HuntU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1817
- Whitely v. SwayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Reeves v. Keystone Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.