Legal Opinion
Heston v. Kuhlke
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1950No. 10935PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The cause is one begun by Heston seeking a patent under § 4915, R.S., Title 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, as an unsuccessful party to interference proceedings in the Patent Office, numbered 78936, 78937, 77479 and 78938. National Rubber Machinery Company is assignee of Heston and both urge Heston’s priority of conception and constructive reduction to practice of inventions covered by claims granted in the Patent Office to the appellees Kuhlke and Soderquist. The latter, successful in proceedings before the Board of Interference Examiners, were awarded priority, Kuhlke in Nos. 78936…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Planing-Machine Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Christensson v. HogdalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Sanford v. KepnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Toledo Scale Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Toledo Scale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Bunny Bear, Inc. v. Dennis Mitchell IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.