Legal Opinion

Walker v. Woolbright Motors, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1979No. 11253PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s predecessor, a Rolla Pontiac dealer, sold plaintiff a 1971 2-door Pontiac Trans Am automobile on January 15, 1975. Inter alia, on the reverse side of defendant’s order form was printed: “[Defendant] warrants this car to be 100 percent ‘Certified Conditioned’ and unconditionally guaranteed. For a period of 30 days or 2,000 miles from purchase, [defendant] will repair or replace any defective part of component below at no cost to the purchaser for any parts or any labor.” The day after plaintiff purchased the Trans Am he experienced unspecified mechanical difficulty with the vehicle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Brassfield v. SearsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Haase v. RichmondMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Dickey Co., Inc. v. KananMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Plumlee v. Ramsay Dry Goods CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Berry v. Federal Kemper Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Maples v. Charles Burt Realtor, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Grosser v. Kandel-Iken Builders, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Elliott v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API