Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1985No. WD36412PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIXON, Judge.

The Elliotts appeal from the jury verdict for Mid-Century in a suit for payment on a fire insurance policy. They assert error arises from (1) Mid-Century’s use of allegedly unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial; (2) Mid-Century’s review of the criminal file of Don Elliott’s arson trial; (3) the trial court denial of evidence of Don’s acquittal; (4) the use of the transcript of the testimony of Kathleen Higgins from the prior criminal trial; (5) Mid-Century’s final argument. All of the error is claimed to be cumulative, but only the acquittal issue and the prior testimony…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  5. Myers v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Day Advertising Inc. v. DeVries & Associates, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Turner v. Fuqua Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Adams v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bogart v. JackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Richter v. KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API