Elliott v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Judge.
The Elliotts appeal from the jury verdict for Mid-Century in a suit for payment on a fire insurance policy. They assert error arises from (1) Mid-Century’s use of allegedly unconstitutionally seized evidence at trial; (2) Mid-Century’s review of the criminal file of Don Elliott’s arson trial; (3) the trial court denial of evidence of Don’s acquittal; (4) the use of the transcript of the testimony of Kathleen Higgins from the prior criminal trial; (5) Mid-Century’s final argument. All of the error is claimed to be cumulative, but only the acquittal issue and the prior testimony…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Greenberg v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Myers v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Day Advertising Inc. v. DeVries & Associates, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Turner v. Fuqua Homes, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Adams v. Burlington Northern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bogart v. JackMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Richter v. KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.