Legal Opinion

Haase v. Richmond

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1978No. 10365PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought suit to specifically enforce the option-to-purchase portion of a 5-year lease which he and defendant-owner executed March 14, 1971. Inter alia, the contract reserved $85 per month rent unto defendant, which plaintiff faithfully paid, and provided that plaintiff “may purchase at any time said property [during the] next 5 years for the purchase price of $22,000.” The Circuit Court of Lawrence County obliged plaintiff and defendant appealed. 1

Defendant was a single woman when the contract relating to her farm was signed. She had no dealings with plaintiff prior to execution.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Steen v. RustadMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Barber v. M. F. A. Milling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HeimMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Freshour v. SchuerenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Lusco v. TavitianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fujita v. JeffriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. SimpsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Kurtz v. FischerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. McClelland v. WilliamsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Smith v. HammonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API