Legal Opinion
City of Arlington v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 2008No. 80395-1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.
¶1 Snohomish County passed an ordinance amending the comprehensive plan to change the designation and zoning of 110.5 acres of land to urban and general commercial. The petitioners here requested the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board (Board) review the county ordinance to determine if the decision was consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70ARCW. The Board found the ordinance invalid as noncompliant with the GMA. The Superior Court affirmed the decision of the Board. It also held the change was precluded on res judicata grounds…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Costanich v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. FuturewiseWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. FuturewiseWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.