Legal Opinion

City of Arlington v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 2008No. 80395-1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 P.3d 1077 (2008)

CITY OF ARLINGTON, Dwayne Lane, and Snohomish County, Respondents,

v.

CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, State of Washington; 1000 Friends of Washington nka Futurewise; Stillaguamish Flood Control District; Pilchuck Audobon Society; The Director of the State of Washington Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development; and Agriculture for Tomorrow, Petitioners.

No. 80395-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 13, 2005.

Decided October 9, 2008.

Henry E. Lippek, The Public Advocate, Tim Trohimovich, Futurewise, Keith Patrick Scully,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Costanich v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICESCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Kittitas County v. Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. FuturewiseWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gold Star Resorts, Inc. v. FuturewiseWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. City of Aberdeen v. ReganWashington Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API