Legal Opinion

George Petro, Inc. v. Bailey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided September 20, 1968PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD P. HILL, Judge.

The three appellees filed this common law action to recover from their employer for injuries sustained in an automobile collision while on their way to work for appellant George Petro, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Petro. Howard Smith, another employee of Petro, was operating the vehicle in which appellees were riding. Petro and appellees had accepted the provisions of and were operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time of the injuries.

The only question involved on this appeal concerns the right of appellees to maintain a common law action. Appellants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  2. Black v. TichenorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
  3. Conder v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  4. Gray v. W. T. Congleton Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. MeyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Indiana Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Andrews v. PetersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Daniels v. SwoffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Kaycee Coal Company v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  5. Johnson v. LohreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API