Legal Opinion
Harold D. Miller, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 4, 1982No. 81-1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue presented is whether the issuance of the subject certificate of public convenience and necessity was unreasonable or unlawful. R.C. 4921.10, which sets forth standards governing the commission’s determination of whether to grant an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity, provides, in part:
*163“The commission may, after notice and hearing, when the applicant requests a certificate to serve in a territory already served by a motor transportation company holding a certificate of public convenience and necessity from the commission, grant a certificate only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Delphos v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Bray v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Ideal Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Motor Service Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Canton Storage & Transfer Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Allen v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Canton Storage & Transfer Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Bob's Truck Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982