Mironski v. Snohomish County
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered May 18,1920, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of defendant, in an action in tort.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The appellant, Mironski, brought this action in the superior court of Snohomish county, to recover for personal injuries. At the time of his injury, the appellant was riding in an automobile driven by another over a public highway in the respondent county. While crossing a bridge, forming a part of the highway, the driver for some cause lost control of the automobile and it was precipitated over the side of the bridge, through the railing of the bridge into a ivater course below. The appellant alleged in his complaint that the accident was due to the defective condition of the bridge. After…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. KrugWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- McClure v. City of Red WingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Smith v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Minneapolis v. WilkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Jackson v. PoolTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Prescott v. SumidArizona Supreme Court · 1926
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
- Nichols v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Rowley v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Dean v. Group Health Cooperative of Puget SoundCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991