Legal Opinion

Van Der Stok v. Van Voorhees

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 24, 2005No. 2004-231PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The plaintiff, Frank Van Der Stok, appeals the Trial Court’s (Vaughan, J.) rulings denying him summary judgment and awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant, Wayne Van Voorhees. We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.

The trial court noted the following facts in its order on summary judgment. This case arises out of a transaction for the sale of real estate in Hanover between the defendant as buyer and the plaintiff as seller. During negotiations, the defendant explained to the plaintiff that he wanted to build a seasonal home near Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, where his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Harkeem v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  3. Snierson v. ScrutonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  4. Clipper Affiliates, Inc. v. ChecovichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Cutter v. Town of FarmingtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
  2. Stewart v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. Avery v. First Resolution Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Porter v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  5. Poeppel v. LesterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API