Legal Opinion
King County v. Central Puget Sound
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 2000No. 68284-4PublishedCited by 220 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
14 P.3d 133 (2000)
142 Wash.2d 543
JOKING COUNTY, Respondent,
v.
CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, an agency of the State of Washington, Defendant, and
Upper Green Valley Preservation Society; Hollywood Hill Association; Robert E. Tidball (d/b/a T & M Berry Farm); Preserve Land for Agriculture Now; and Puget Sound Farm Trust, Appellants, and
Jun and Shelley Akutsu; City of Woodinville; Woodinville Fire & Life Safety District; Michael J. Alberg, Thomas A. Alberg, Kay L. Alberg; and Novelty Neighbors, Defendants, and
Northshore Youth Soccer Association; Pro Parks; Woodinville…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- National Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Buechel v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by220 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Spokane Research & Defense Fund v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- HJS Development, Inc. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- SPOKANE RESEARCH FUND v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.