Legal Opinion

Port of Seattle v. Pollution Control Hearings Board

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 2004No. 73419-4PublishedCited by 180 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

Construction of the third runway at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac) will require placing fill into area wetlands. Before the Army Corps of Engineers may issue a permit to fill wetlands, the project proponent must obtain certification from the State, pursuant to § 401 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1341), stating that there is reasonable assurance that the project will not violate applicable state water quality standards. On September 21, 2001, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued a § 401 water quality certification to the Port of Seattle (Port) for the…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by180 opinions

  1. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Densley v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 2007

175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API