Legal Opinion
Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 2005No. 75076-9PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*228¶1 Once again we are confronted with a conflict between competing powers under the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW. This time the controversy concerns King County’s designation of approximately 2,500 acres of land situated between Redmond and Duval in Rang County as an urban growth area (UGA), and subsequently, in the alternative, as a fully contained community (FCC).
Bridge, J.
¶2 The question raised is whether King County’s actions complied with the GMA. King County first designated the area as a UGA in its original 1994 comprehensive plan. Since that time, there have been…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Quadrant Corp. v. STATE, GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Lewis County v. WESTERN WA. GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BD.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Thurston County v. W. WASH. GROWTH MANAGEMENTWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Lewis County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2006
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.