State v. Valenzuela
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.
These consolidated appeals follow convictions of the three defendants on a total of seventeen charges under the controlled drug act, RSA chapter 318-B, including possession of large quantities of cocaine with intent to sell. The defendants claim that the Superior Court (Wyman, J.) erred in authorizing the interception of the contents of communications transmitted over defendant Stephen Young’s telephone lines on the basis, in part, of information obtained by the use of pen registers, previously installed on the same lines under a federal court’s order unsupported by probable cause; that Gray,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. PellicciSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. MultalerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CaneloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.