Legal Opinion

State v. Gravel

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 31, 1991No. 89-283PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendant, Raymond Gravel, appeals his jury conviction for possession of cocaine, claiming that the Trial *174Court {Dunn, J.) committed error in refusing to grant his pre-trial motion seeking to have suppressed at trial certain statements he made after his arrest and all physical evidence obtained as a result of those statements. In addition, he claims that inadmissible hearsay was repeatedly placed before the jury, and that his requests for a mistrial on that basis were erroneously denied. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

The facts, as they relate to this appeal, are as follows.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Snow v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. CaneloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. LeClair v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API