Legal Opinion

Bixler v. Oro Management, L.L.C.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2004No. 03-44PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Ron Bixler and Oro Management, LLC, (Oro) purchased property jointly and received a warranty deed as tenants in common. When Mr. Bixler sought partition of the property, Oro claimed the parties had a prior agreement that Mr. Bixler’s tenancy in common did not extend to the mineral estate. The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Oro holding the prior agreement, which preceded the warranty deed, was determinative of the parties’ interests. However, the district court also held that agreement was ambiguous regarding what the parties intended by a “net…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Watt v. Western Nuclear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Midkiff v. Castle & Cooke, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Gawryluk v. PoynterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Glover v. GiraldoWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Gilstrap v. June Eisele Warren TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Wilson v. Town of AlpineWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hofstad v. ChristieWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Seven Lakes Development Co. v. MaxsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API