Legal Opinion

Glover v. Giraldo

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1992No. 91-54PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Appellants William and Sheila Glover appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, nunc pro tunc, in this dispute concerning property interests in land adjoining a non-navigable stream. At issue is the interpretation of the legal property description and an alternative claim of adverse possession.

We affirm the orders granting summary judgment, nunc pro tunc, as to the interpretation of the legal description and reverse and remand on the claim of adverse possession.

FACTS

William and Sheila Glover sought to quiet title in property lying between the West bank and the thread…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stewart v. . TurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Lane Co. Ex Rel. Lane v. Busch Development, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. McIntosh v. Magna Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  4. Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. More v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Krenning v. Heart Mountain Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Edgcomb v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Redland v. RedlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Jackson State Bank v. HomarWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bixler v. Oro Management, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API