County of Stearns v. Schaaf
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Daniel Schaaf filed this appeal from a February 7, 1991 final judgment of paternity on April 30, 1991. The appeal papers indicated that an adverse party had served notice of the February 7 judgment on February 27. This court questioned whether a paternity action is a “special proceeding” under Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.03(g), and if so, whether the appeal was timely. The parties filed jurisdiction memoranda.
DECISION
Generally, an appeal from a final judgment in an ordinary civil action must be taken within 90 days after entry of judg ment. See…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Mely v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In re Washington County, State of Minnesota v. Erik Lawrence BaderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026