Legal Opinion

County of Stearns v. Schaaf

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1991No. C7-91-749PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Daniel Schaaf filed this appeal from a February 7, 1991 final judgment of paternity on April 30, 1991. The appeal papers indicated that an adverse party had served notice of the February 7 judgment on February 27. This court questioned whether a paternity action is a “special proceeding” under Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.03(g), and if so, whether the appeal was timely. The parties filed jurisdiction memoranda.

DECISION

Generally, an appeal from a final judgment in an ordinary civil action must be taken within 90 days after entry of judg ment. See…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Schuster v. SchusterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. TrojakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Mely v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. In re Washington County, State of Minnesota v. Erik Lawrence BaderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API