Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Winona Housing & Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1967No. 40259PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*77Nelson, Justice.

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment dismissing his action for declaratory judgment. There appear to be three issues raised on appeal: (1) Whether in this instance the appeal is properly taken from the judgment; (2) whether plaintiff’s complaint herein violates Rule 8.05, Rules of Civil Procedure, which specifies that “[e]ach averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct”; and (3) whether a justiciable controversy exists.

Plaintiff is a practicing attorney in the city of Winona and also an owner of real estate in the downtown portion of that southern Minnesota…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Saint Luke's Hospital v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Lee v. DelmontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. HavelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dodd v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Beatty v. EllingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Willeck v. WilleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Rock v. Hennepin Broadcasting Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Hense v. G.D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API