Borkin v. Alexander
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
“The only issue presented by a motion for summary judgment is whether or not there is a substantial issue of fact to be tried. If there is, the motion will be denied. Hintz v. Darling Freight, Inc. (1962), 17 Wis. (2d) 376, 117 N. W. (2d) 271. The power of the courts under the summary-judgment statute is drastic, and should be exercised only when it is plain that there is no substantial issue of fact, or if permissible inference from undisputed facts, to be tried. If the inferences to be drawn from credible evidence are doubtful and uncertain, a motion for summary judgment should be denied.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Bond v. HarrelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Schaap v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Hintz v. Darling Freight, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Carothers v. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conrad Milwaukee Corp. v. WasilewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. LeistikowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Krukowski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Michael F. Connor and Jane H. Connor v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Connor, Michael F. v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.