Legal Opinion

Tripcevich v. Compton

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1938No. Civ. 5895PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Respondents herein are the husband and grandchildren of Angie Nicovich, who brought this action to recover damages for her death. The death was caused, as alleged in the complaint, by the negligent operation of an automobile owned by Evelyn Compton, and being then driven by Fred E. Compton. Upon the trial a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs for $600. Deeming the award inadequate, plaintiffs filed the following notice of intention to move for a new trial:

“You and each of you will please hereby take notice that plaintiffs above named intend to and will move the above entitled court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Bencich v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. Locke v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bauder v. TyrrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Sassano v. RoullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Wallace v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Haser v. PapeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API