Locke v. Moulton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
— Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.
The complaint was in ejectment to recover certain, lands therein described, alleging ownership in fee for five years last past. A general demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled.
The defendants answered, and set up three separate defenses: 1. Denied plaintiff’s ownership and right of possession, admitted the possession of S. M. McCloud, *24denied that it was unlawful, and denied that either of the other defendants were in possession. 2. Alleged that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Husheon v. HusheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Bauder v. TyrrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- O'Connell v. Main & Tenth Streets Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Sawyer v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Aguilar v. BocciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.