Legal Opinion
M.N. v. D.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 22, 2000No. C9-00-437Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant M.N. challenges the district court’s order granting summary judgment to respondent D.S. We affirm.
FACTS
In March 1995, appellant M.N. discovered she was pregnant and notified respondent D.S. that she believed he was the father. D.S., who was married to another woman, hired a lawyer and advised M.N., through the lawyer, that he would either: (1) pay child support for the unborn child after paternity was established; or (2) negotiate a settlement with M.N.
M.N. hired her own lawyer to conduct settlement negotiations with D.S.’s attorney. On May 19,1995, the parties…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lubbers v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Vandeputte v. SoderholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- R.E.R. v. J.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Perry v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994