Legal Opinion
Perry v. Atkinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 1987No. D004425PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HUFFMAN, J. *
Plaintiff Lee Perry appeals a judgment favoring defendant Richard Atkinson after the court granted summary adjudication of issues and sustained Atkinson’s demurrer to Perry’s second amended complaint for fraud and deceit.
Factual 1 and Procedural Background
Perry and Atkinson met in July 1976. Although Atkinson was married, he and Perry began having an intimate relationship which continued for more than a year. During that year, Perry and Atkinson developed a relationship of trust and confidence. In August 1977 Perry learned she was pregnant with Atkinson’s child. When Perry…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Kathleen K. v. Robert B.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Commercial Standard Insurance v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Boyd v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Richard P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- C.A.M. v. R.A.W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Belken v. Belken CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- C.A.M. v. R.A.W.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.