Legal Opinion

Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 1994No. C7-93-2036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This foreclosure action involves a combined mechanics’ hen statement on multiple lots. New Horizon Homes, Inc. (developer) hired DayCo Concrete Company, Inc. (mechanic) to perform concrete, masonry, and foundation construction for a multifamily townhouse development in Woodbury. The mechanic was not paid for its labor and materials. When the mechanic attempted to foreclose its hens, several owners and mortgagees moved for summary judgment claiming the combined hen statement failed as a matter of law. The trial court denied that motion. The parties stipulated to the facts,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re Application of JuranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. M.N. v. D.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API