Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Crouch

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1955No. 389PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant insists that by virtue of the provisions contained in Article IV, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States, we must give full faith and credit to the judgment entered in the Circuit Court of Pittsylvania County, Virginia, in the action of Bullock v. Cherry. Conceding this to be so, it does not follow that such judgment is binding on the defendant in this action.

To bind Crouch by the Virginia judgment it must appear that he was a party to such action or in privity with the defendant therein. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co., 225 U.S. 111, 56 L. Ed.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Pinnix v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Green v. BogueSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Meacham v. . Larus Brothers Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Sherwood v. Huber & Huber Motor Exp. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Masters v. DunstanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Wirth v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Thompson v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. MacFarlane v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API