Legal Opinion

Wirth v. Bracey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 11, 1963No. 528, 529PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant’s assignments of error are based on his exceptions to the orders entered by Judge Hall on April 12, 1962, prior to jury trial. Defendant does not attack the manner in which the jury trial was conducted. Indeed, neither the evidence nor the court’s charge is in the record on appeal.

The sole question presented by each appeal is whether the court erred in overruling defendant’s said pleas in abatement and in bar. The (admitted) facts relevant to this question are: These actions were instituted July 21, 1960. Prior thereto, to wit, on or about June 10, 1960, as authorized by the Tort…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Holland v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Allen v. . SalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Simmons v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Pangburn v. SaadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API