Legal Opinion
Hopfer v. Hopfer
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 22, 2000No. AC 19162PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SHEA, J.
The plaintiff, Janet G. Hopfer, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to the defendant, Richard A. Hopfer, Jr. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) found that the defendant’s unvested stock options were not marital assets and therefore not subject to distribution, (2) awarded nonmodifiable time limited alimony for a period of eleven years and (3) awarded an inadequate amount of alimony, that is, $72,000 annually for two *454years and $48,000 annually for an additional nine years. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hirtle v. HirtleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Lowe v. LoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Markarian v. MarkarianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Ashton v. AshtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rosato v. RosatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Kiniry v. KiniryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Murray v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Foley v. FoleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Burns v. AdlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.