Legal Opinion
Ashton v. Ashton
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 29, 1993No. 11009PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant, Heinke P. Ashton, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving her marriage to the plaintiff. She claims that the *737judgment is fatally flawed because the trial court improperly (1) divided the parties’ assets, (2) awarded time limited alimony, (3) precluded the defendant from introducing expert testimony at trial, and (4) accepted financial information submitted by the plaintiff that was speculative and based its financial award on this information. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts found by the trial court are necessary to a resolution of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Lowe v. LoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Askinazi v. AskinaziConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Hill v. HillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Hopfer v. HopferConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.