Legal Opinion

Markarian v. Markarian

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 6, 1984No. (2348)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff appealed 1 from the judgment in an action for dissolution of a marriage. No objections are made to the dissolution of the marriage or to the disposition concerning the parties’ property. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that the award of periodic alimony is inadequate both in amount and duration.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married in 1947. Dissolution proceedings were instituted in 1981 and, in 1982, the matter was heard by a state referee. After finding that the marriage between the parties had broken down and allocating their property, the referee ordered the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Scoville v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Kane v. ParryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Ippolito v. IppolitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Roach v. RoachConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Watson v. WatsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API