Legal Opinion
Murray v. Murray
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2001No. AC 20847PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Janice Murray, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion for permission to relocate to California with the parties’ *92two minor children. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court abused its discretion in concluding that the custodial parent’s relocation to California is not in the best interests of the children. Specifically, the plaintiff contends that the trial court improperly (1) failed to address or put proper weight on the “family unit factor” set forth in Ireland v. Ireland, 246 Conn. 413, 717 A.2d 676 (1998) (en banc), (2)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- MATTER OF TROPEA v. TropeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Moore v. GanimSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Ireland v. IrelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Wendt v. WendtConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Wendt v. WendtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. GabelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Evans v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Ford v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Murray v. MurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001