Chernovitz v. Preston Trucking Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*571 Opinion
DUPONT, J.
In this appeal, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-290a,1 from a decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner in favor of the plaintiff employee, the defendant employer claims that the commissioner failed to consider (1) whether the plaintiff met his burden of proof and (2) whether the defendant had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for challenging the findings of the plaintiff’s treating physician. We affirm the commissioner’s decision.
General Statutes § 31-290a (a) provides: “No employer . . . shall ... in any manner discriminate against any employee because the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Berchtold v. MaggiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Schaffer v. LindyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Chiaia v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cable v. Bic Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Kopacz v. Day Kimball Hospital of Windham County, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Knoblaugh v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Cable v. Bic Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Baillargeon v. First Union National Bank, No. Cv98-0262723-S (May 3, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.