Legal Opinion

Conner v. Rose

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1963No. Civ. 27177PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

The plaintiff herein appeals from the order of dismissal which was entered upon the motion of defendant and respondent.

The record before us consists of (1) appellant’s complaint filed January 23, 1961, against one Jeff Chandler and seeking recovery of money allegedly due under a contract providing that appellant would perform certain services as a “Personal Manager”; (2) an answer filed by Jeff Chandler on March 14, 1961, in which the allegations of the complaint were generally and specifically denied and it was alleged by way of affirmative defense that appellant’s complaint failed to state…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Scott v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Santa Clara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Dorsic v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Crummer v. ZalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Webman v. Little Co. of Mary HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API