Legal Opinion
Davis v. Emery Worldwide Corp.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 23, 2003No. 02-228-P-HPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID M. COHEN, United States ■ Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Emery Worldwide Com poration, moves for summary judgment on all claims set forth .in the complaint. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, etc. (“Motion”) (Docket No. 14) at 1. I recommend that the court grant the motion in part.
I. Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment is appropriate only if the record shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “In…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dunbar v. Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers of Iowa, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
- Ramsdell v. Huhtamaki, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2014
- Lakshman v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Harding v. CIANBRO CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2006
- Vogan v. US Oncology, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.