Legal Opinion
Vogan v. US Oncology, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided October 30, 2003No. 02-4207-CV-C-NKLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #45]. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied.
I. Factual Background
Solely for the purpose of the Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motion, the Court views the facts in a light most favorable to the Plaintiff, accepting as true Plaintiff Stacy Vogan’s (“Vogan”) version of the facts when they are disputed.
In this lawsuit, Vogan claims the Defendants terminated her. employment because of her pregnancy in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (“PDA”) amendments to Title…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Self v. Midwest Orthopedics Foot & Ankle, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Levias v. Texas Dept. of Criminal JusticeDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004