Legal Opinion
Lakshman v. University of Maine System
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 6, 2004No. CV-03-52-B-WPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER ON DEFENDANT UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dilip K. Lakshman, Ph.D. (Lakshman), is employed as a Senior Scientist at the University of Maine. A dark skinned male of East Asian descent, Dr. Lakshman was born in India and speaks with an Indian accent. 1 He has filed suit, claiming the University of Maine System (University) violated his legal rights due to his race, color, ethnicity, national origin, and gender. This Court grants the University’s Motion for Summary Judgment, because Dr. Lakshman’s claims are either time…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flood v. Bank of America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Doe v. Brown UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Gonzalez-Bermudez v. Abbott Laboratories PR Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
- Fernandez v. M & L Milevoi Management, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Richards v. City of BangorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.