Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Hurlbut Undertaking & Embalming Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 28, 1940PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs recovered (before the court without a jury) a judgment against defendant in the sum of $411 alleged to be the amount owed for the year 1938, by defendant for employer contributions under our unemployment compensation law. [Laws 1937, p. 574 et seq., amended 1939, Laws 1939, p. 892 et seq.] Defendant appealed to the Springfield Court of Appeals, and that court, on motion of plaintiffs and under Sec. 1914, R.S. 1929, Ann. Stat., p. 2587, transferred the cause here on the theory that a state officer is a party. [Constitution, Sec. 12, Art. 6.]

[1] Our jurisdiction is not especially…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Howes Bros. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Beeland Wholesale Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Lucas v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Murphy v. LimppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Bohling v. CorsiNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Murphy v. Doniphan Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API