Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Doniphan Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1941PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover "contributions" alleged to be due under the provisions of our Unemployment Compensation Act. [Laws 1937, p. 574 et seq., amended 1939, Laws 1939, p. 892 et seq., Mo. Stat. Ann., sec. 13194, sec. 1 et seq., p. 4770.] Upon a trial before the court, without the aid of a jury, a judgment was entered for the defendant and plaintiffs have appealed.

[1] We have jurisdiction by reason of the fact that appellants are state officers within the meaning of Section 12, Article 6 of the Constitution. [Murphy, Sr., v. Hurlbut Undertaking Embalming Co., 346 Mo. 405, 142 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Laclede Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Dempsey v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Gibson Products Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Maine Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Androscoggin Junior, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  5. Grafeman Dairy Co. v. Northwestern BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Texas Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BassTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Meyers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Graue v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Kellogg v. MurphySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Southgate Bank and Trust Co. v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API