Bohling v. Corsi
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRingbose, J.
The plaintiff in this action seeks a judgment declaring unconstitutional the provisions of the Unemployment Insurance Law (Labor Law, § 562) relating to the termination of the liability of an employer for the 2.7% pay roll tax. The legal conclusions alleged in the complaint are denied in the answer, and judgment declaring the challenged provisions constitutional, is sought by the defendants. Both parties move for judgment on the pleadings.
*780The undisputed facts are: The plaintiff, a building contractor in the city of Utica, New York, employed four persons from April, 1947, to January, 1951.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- W. H. H. Chamberlin, Inc. v. AndrewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- National Psychological Ass'n for Psychoanalysis, Inc. v. University of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. Reilly, New York County Courts1976
- People v. LoftonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. Block, New York County Courts1972
- People v. GilbertCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.