Legal Opinion
Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 24, 1979PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSidor, J.
The defendant, Stanley V. Tucker, has appealed from a judgment for foreclosure by sale, and for reimbursement to the plaintiff, Hartford National Bank and Trust Company, of certain necessary expenses and for attorneys’ fees. The trial court concluded that the defendant was in default on his note which was secured by a mortgage on property owned by the defendant in Torrington, Connecticut.
The facts found by the trial court are as follows: On February 24, 1966, the defendant Stanley V. Tucker executed a promissory note to the plaintiff, Hartford National Bank and Trust Company, which was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Clover v. UrbanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Dana-Robin Corp. v. Common Council of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Upson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.