Legal Opinion
Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents v. E. Leitz, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 27, 1958No. 14159_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
The appellee in 1950 filed an aplication, pursuant to the provisions of the Act of July 5, 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1051, for the registration of the trademark here in issue. After extended proceedings in the Patent Office, the Assistant Commisioner of Patents denied the application on the ground that the applicant, the appellee here, was not the owner of the trademark. The applicant then filed suit in the District Court under section 1071 of Title 15 and section 145 of Title 35 of the United States Code, praying for a decree adjudging that it was entitled to registration of the mark…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Speed Products Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- E. Leitz, Inc. v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mister Donut of America, Inc. v. Mr. Donut, Inc., Mr. Donut, Inc. v. Mister Donut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Osawa & Co. v. B & H PHOTODistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- F. PALICIO Y COMPANIA, SA v. BrushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Bell & Howell : Mamiya Co. v. Masel Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- El Greco Leather Products Co. v. Shoe World, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.