Legal Opinion
Speed Products Co., Inc. v. Tinnerman Products, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 14, 1949No. 21373_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The Plaintiff’s Appeal.
This appeal is from the judgment which granted registration under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, as amended, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, to the plaintiff’s trade-mark despite the denial of the application filed on May 22, 1943 in the Patent Office, Serial No. 460,846. The mark is composed of a design representing a sort of broad arrow having wings with lines simulating flight, with the word “Speed” prominently displayed on the arrow and taking up nearly all of the space which evidently is intended to represent the shaft. The application was for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- LaTouraine Coffee Co. v. Lorraine Coffee Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- George W. Luft Co. v. Zande Cosmetic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Best & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Scott Paper Company, a Corporation v. Scott's Liquid Gold, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Cullman Ventures, Inc. v. Columbian Art Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Douglas Laboratories Corp. v. Copper Tan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.