Legal Opinion

SANTOS

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1984No. ID 2969PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2969 MATTER OF SANTOS In Deportation Proceedings A-24879910 Decided by Board June 26, 1.984 (1) An alien must demonstrate that he has been prejudiced by a violation of a proce- dural rule or regulation before his deportation proceeding will be invalidated. (2) In cases arising outside of the United States Courts of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the District of Columbia Circuit, a violation of the right to counsel in a deportation proceeding may be disregarded as harmless error so long as the vio- ianon is not fundamentally unfair and dues nut. demonstrably- prejudice…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. Frebert Bonhometre v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Carlos Huicochea-Gomez and Margot Huicochea-Reza v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Julio Donaldo Ponce-Leiva v. John D. Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. BATISTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API