Legal Opinion
Carlos Huicochea-Gomez and Margot Huicochea-Reza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2001No. 99-4119PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILMAN, Circuit Judge.
Carlos Huicochea-Gomez and Margot Huicochea-Reza (the Huicocheas), husband and wife, are citizens of Mexico. They have lived in the United States continuously since 1988. Both entered the United States as nonimmigrant visitors, which authorized them to remain in the country for no longer than six months. In 1997, the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) charged that the Huicocheas were subject to removal under § 237(a)(1)(B) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B), for remaining in the United States beyond the time…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio YangSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mario Antonio Portillo Baires v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Mejia Rodriguez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Lara-Torres v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Xu Yong Lu v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Hamid B. Mohammed v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Angela Stroe and Marin Stroe v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.