Legal Opinion

Michigan Basic Property Ins. Ass'n v. Detroit Edison Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2000No. Docket 211293PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSaad, J.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

Defendant’s customer, Van Dyke Liquor Market, suffered property damage due to a fire caused by an electrical power surge. Plaintiffs, Michigan Basic Property Insurance Association and Lloyd’s of London, the insurance carriers for Van Dyke Liquor Market, paid their insured for its loss. Plaintiffs then filed this subrogation action against defendant to recover for the property damage. Plaintiffs alleged that defendant’s negligent handling of power transmission equipment caused the fire.

In the trial court, defendant asserted the defense of primary jurisdiction and argued…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hart v. LudwigMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Schultz v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Rinaldo's Construction Corp. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Karbel v. Comerica BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Kokx v. BylengaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Meridian Mutual Insurance v. Mason-Dixon Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API