Legal Opinion

Kokx v. Bylenga

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2000No. Docket 215038PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Defendants/third-party plaintiffs, attorney Dan E. Bylenga, Jr., and the law firm of Schenk, Boncher & Prasher (collectively, defendants), appeal by leave granted the circuit court’s order granting summary disposition to third-party defendant Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone (Miller Canfield) of defendants’ contribution claim. We affirm.

Following termination of Jerome Kokx’ employment with Gainey Transportation Services (Gainey) in November 1991, Kokx and his wife, Mary Kokx (plaintiffs), retained defendants to, among other things, assist them in exercising their Gainey stock options. Gainey…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Marlette Homes, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Simko v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Gross v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Al-Maliki v. LaGrantMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Holton v. A+ Insurance Associates, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re Estate of MoukalledMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Gerling Konzern Allgemeine Versicherungs AG v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. King v. Oakland County ProsecutorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API