Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey Transportation, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.
Granting in Part & Denying in Part Amerisure’s Motion for Summary Judgment;
Granting in Part & Denying in Part Carey Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment;
Granting Adriatic’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Carey’s Third-Party Complaint;
Terminating the Case
This is a diversity insurance coverage dispute governed by Michigan state law. Plaintiff Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (“Amerisure”) issued a commercial trucker’s insurance policy to defendant Carey Transportation, Inc. (“Carey”). Non-party February Fourteen, Inc. (“FFI”) hired Carey to…
2Cases cited151 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rusakiewicz v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Ile v. Foremost InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Lakeland Regional Health System v. Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.