Legal Opinion

Amerisure Mutual Insurance v. Carey Transportation, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 26, 2008No. 1:06-CV-892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

PAUL L. MALONEY, Chief Judge.

Granting in Part & Denying in Part Amerisure’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

Granting in Part & Denying in Part Carey Transport’s Motion for Summary Judgment;

Granting Adriatic’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Carey’s Third-Party Complaint;

Terminating the Case

This is a diversity insurance coverage dispute governed by Michigan state law. Plaintiff Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company (“Amerisure”) issued a commercial trucker’s insurance policy to defendant Carey Transportation, Inc. (“Carey”). Non-party February Fourteen, Inc. (“FFI”) hired Carey to…

2Cases cited151 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rusakiewicz v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Smith v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  3. Ile v. Foremost InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Lakeland Regional Health System v. Walgreens Health Initiatives, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Mid-Century Insurance v. FishDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API